- Методика построения кодов специального назначения (симуляторов) на основе плазмофизического комплекса ДИНА для анализа эволюции плазмы в токамаке в процессе управляемых и неуправляемых сценариев.
- Диффузионная модель эволюции тока гало в плазме токамаке в процессе срыва.
- Код для решения задачи восстановления магнитной конфигурации токамака по магнитным данным с учетом распределения тока в области гало.
- Разработка проектных сценариев эволюции плазмы токамака-реактора ИТЭР с учетом управления обратными связями, как в режимах с индуктивным поддержанием тока, так и в режимах с токами увлечения.
- Исследование эволюции плазмы токамака TCV при неуправляемом ее движении по вертикали.
- Методика комплексного анализа сценариев срыва тока в плазме токамака-реактора ИТЭР.
- Методика анализа эволюции гало токов в эксперименте на основе их восстановления по данным магнитной диагностики токамака, скейлинг для расчета ширины области гало.
- Получение критической величины запаса устойчивости на границе плазмы токамака JT-60U в момент теплового срыва при неуправляемом ее движении по вертикали.
- Методика построения диаграммы движения плазмы ИТЭР по вертикали во время большого срыва.
2.R.R. Khayrutdinov, V.E. Lukash. Studies of Plasma Equilibrium and Transport in a Tokamak Fusion Device with the Inverse-Variable Technique // Journal of Computational Physics, 109, No. 2 (1993) 193-201
3.В.Э. Лукаш. Анализ динамики ширины области гало при срыве тока плазмы в токамаке // ВАНТ, сер. Термоядерный синтез, вып. 2, 2007, с. 41-48
4.В.Э. Лукаш, Р.Р. Хайрутдинов. Моделирование эволюции плазмы ИТЭР при ее вертикальном смещении // ВАНТ, Термоядерный синтез, вып. 1 (1999) с. 3-7
5.V.E. Lukash, M. Sugihara, Y. Gribov, H. Fujieda. Analysis of the direction of plasma vertical movement during major disruptions in ITER // Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 47 (2005) 2077-2086
6.V.E. Lukash, Y. Gribov, A. Kavin, R. Khayrutdinov, M. Cavinato. Simulations of ITER scenarios // Plasma Devices and Operations 13 No.2 (2005) 143-156
7.V.E. Lukash; A. Kavin; Y. Gribov; R. Khayrutdinov; H. Fujieda. Simulation of ITER Scenario 2 with different schemes of current ramp-up // Plasma Devices and Operations, 15, No.4 (2007) 283-297
8.M. Sugihara, V.E. Lukash, R.R. Khayrutdinov,Y. Neyatani. Edge safety factor at the onset of plasma disruption during VDEs in JT-60U // Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 46 (2004) 1581-1589
9.M. Sugihara, M. Shimada, H. Fujieda, Yu. Gribov, K. Ioki, Y. Kawano, R. Khayrutdinov, V. Lukash, J. Ohmori. Disruption scenarios, their mitigation and operation window in ITER // Nuclear Fusion 47 (2007) 337-352
10.D.Kh. Morozov, E.I. Yurchenko, V.E. Lukash et al. Mechanisms of disruptions caused by noble gas injection into tokamak plasmas // Nucl. Fusion 45 (2005) 882-887
11.V.E. Lukash, D. Raju, V.N. Dokuka, J-Y. Favez, R.R. Khairutdinov, J.B. Lister. DINA simulations of TCV electron cyclotron heating discharges // Fusion Eng. and Design 66-68 (2003) 767-770
12.M. Sugihara, V. Lukash et al. Wave Form of Current Quench during Disruptions in Tokamaks // Journal of Plasma and Fusion Research 79 No.7 (2003) 706-712
13.J.B. Lister, R.R. Khayrutdinov, D.J.N. Limebeer, V.E. Lukash, et al. Linear and non-linear plasma equilibrium responses on the JT-60U and TCV tokamaks // Fusion Eng. And Design 56-57 (2001) 755-759
14.J-Y. Favez, R.R. Khayrutdinov, J.B. Lister and V.E. Lukash. Comparing TCV experimental VDE responses with DINA code simulations // Plasma Phys. Control. Fusion 44 (2002) 171-193
15.H. Tamai, R. Yoshino, S. Tokuda, G. Kurita, Y. Neyatani, M. Bakhtiari, R.R. Khayrutdinov, V.E. Lukash, M.N. Rosenbluth . Runaway current termination in JT-60U // Nuclear Fusion 42 (2002) 290-294
16.R. Paccagnella, M. Cavinato, T. Bolzonella, S. Ortollani, G. Pautasso, W. Schneider, V. Lukash, et al. Vertical displacement events simulations for tokamak plasmas // Fusion Eng. аnd Design, 75-79 (2005) 589-593
17.V.E. Lukash, A.B. Mineev and D.Kh. Morozov. Influence of plasma opacity on current decay after disruptions in tokamaks // Nuclear Fusion 47 (2007) 1476-1484
18.Н.Н. Васильев, А.Ю. Днестровский, С.И. Крашенинников, В.Э. Лукаш. Проблема старта разряда в токамаке-реакторе типа ITER //Физика плазмы 19 № 3 (1993) 324-334
19.V.E. Lukash, R.R. Khayrutdinov. Model of real time ITER plasma position, shape and current control on base of DINA code // 34th EPS Conf. Plasma Phys., Warsaw, Poland, 2-6 July 2007 ECA Vol. 34, P5.148
20.V.E. Lukash, R.R. Khayrutdinov. Energy Loss with Runaway Electrons During Major Disruption in ITER // Proc. of the 6th IAEA Technical Committee Meeting on Energetic Particles in Magnetic Confinement Systems, Oct. 12-14, 1999, JAERI, Naka, Japan, p. 13-16
21.V.E. Lukash, J.B. Lister, V.N. Dokuka, R.R. Khayrutdinov, Y. Camenen, S. Coda, J.-Y. Favez, A. Pochelon, O. Sauter. Simulation of TCV Equilibria Evolution using the DINA Code // 30th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, St-Petersburg, July 2003 ECA Vol. 27A, P-3.124
22.D.A. Humphreys, A.G. Kellman, R.R. Khayrutdinov and V.E. Lukash. Scoping Studies of ITER Disruption Scenarios Using the DINA Code // Preprint GA-C22692, August 1997, San Diego, CA, USA, pp. 44
23.N.N. Vasiliev, R.R. Khayrutdinov, V.E. Lukash, D.A. Humphreys, A.G. Kellman. Time-dependent Simulation of DIII-D Plasma Evolution using the DINA code // Preprint IAE-6074/7, 1998, 29 c.
24.P.L. Mondino, R. Albanese, G. Ambrosino, M. Ariola, A. Beghi, D. Ciscato, E. Coccorese, Y. Gribov, D. Humphreys, A. Kavin, C. Kessel, R.R. Khayrutdinov, J. Lister, V.E. Lukash et al. Plasma current, position and shape control for ITER // Proc. of 20th Intern. Symposium On Fusion Technology, Marseille, 7-11 September 1998, p. 595-598
25.Y. Gribov, M. Cavinato, A. Kavin, M. Ariola, R. Bulmer, E. Coccorese, H. Fujieda,R. Khayrutdinov, V. Lukash, et. al. ITER-FEAT Scenarios and Plasma Position/Shape Control // 18th IAEA Fusion Energy Conference, Sorrento, Italy, October 2000, IAEA-CN-77/ITERP/02
26.M. Cavinato, A. Kavin, V.E. Lukash and R.R. Khayrutdinov. Non-linear simulations by numerical MHD equilibrium codes in ITER-FEAT // 9th IEEE Int. Conf. On Control Applications, Anchorage, USA, Sept. 2000, p. 406-411
27.Y. Gribov, M. Cavinato, A. Kavin, R.R. Khayrutdinov, V.E. Lukash, P.L.Mondino. Studies of ITER scenarios with DINA code // 28th EPS Conf. On Cont. Fusion and Plasma Physics, Madeira, Portugal, June 2001 ECA Vol. 25A, P2.035 (2001) 617-620
28.M. Sugihara, V.E. Lukash, et al. Examinations on Plasma Behaviors during Disruptions on Existing Tokamaks and Their Extrapolations to ITER // 30th EPS Conference on Plasma Physics and Controlled Fusion, St-Petersburg, July 2003, ECA Vol. 27A, P-2.139 (2003)
29.M. Sugihara, V.E. Lukash et al. Analysis of Disruption Scenarios and Their Possible Mitigation in ITER // Proc. 20th IAEA FEC, Vilamoura, Portugal (2004) IT/P3-29
30.M.J. Windridge, T.C. Hender, G. Cunningham, J.B. Lister, V.E. Lukash, R.R. Khayrutdinov, V.N. Dokuka. MAST Halo Current Simulations with DINA-CH // 34th EPS Conf. on Plasma Phys. and Controlled Fusion, Warsaw, Poland, July 2-6, 2007, ECA Vol. 31F, P1.108 (2007)
31.M. Shimada, M. Sugihara, H. Fujieda, V.E. Lukash et al. Disruption Scenarios, their Mitigation and Operation Window in ITER // Proc. 21st IAEA FEC, Chendu (2006) IT/P1-19
32.V.E. Lukash, J.B. Lister, V. Dokuka, R.R. Khayrutdinov, B.P. Duval, J-M. Moret, J-F. Artaud. V. Baziuk, M. Cavinato. Evolution of the DINA-CH tokamak full discharge simulator // 31st EPS Conference on Plasma Phys. London, 28 June – 2 July 2004 ECA Vol. 28G, P-2.151 (2004)
33.M. Sugihara, H. Ohwaki, Y. Kawano, V.E. Lukash, et al. Extrapolation of Plasma Current Quench Time during Disruptions from Existing Machines to ITER // 31st EPS Conference on Plasma Phys. Tarragona, 27 June – 1 July 2005 ECA Vol. 29C, P-2.067 (2005)
34.H. Ohwaki, M. Sugihara, Y. Kawano, V.E. Lukash, et al. Modeling of Plasma Current Decay during the Disruption // 32nd EPS Conference on Plasma Phys. Tarragona, 27 June – 1 July 2005 ECA Vol. 29C, P-5.099 (2005)